ECT without consent or a second opinion

Section 58A of the Mental Health Act 2007 provides for the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on non-consenting incapable patients with the approval of a second opinion appointed doctor (SOAD), who is a psychiatrist from the Care Quality Commission’s panel. However there are circumstances in which patients can be given ECT without either their consent or a second opinion. If an informal patient is incapable of consenting to treatment but is not objecting to it, they may be treated under common law. No statistics are collected on how many people are treated with ECT in this way, but the number is thought to be very small and some psychiatrists don’t seem to be aware of this option. The other way in which someone can be given ECT without consent or a second opinion is under section 62 of the Mental Health Act, which allows a psychiatrist to give someone ECT before obtaining a SOAD’s permission if they think that the person needs ECT urgently.

According to the report of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) on the administration of the Mental Health Act 2009/10, a record proportion of patients had already been given ECT under section 62 prior to a SOAD visit. This the CQC found “a matter of concern”.

The numbers of people treated under section 62 prior to a SOAD visit in recent years are as follows:

 2004/05   432    33% of all SOAD visits

2005/06    499    18%

2006/07    415    21%

2007/08    357    23%

2008/09    296    26%

2009/10    445    24%

There may also, as the last biennial report of the Mental Health Act Commission pointed out, be some people who are given ECT under section 62 without a subsequent SOAD visit and who won’t therefore be included in the statistics.

The CQC admits that the increase may be partly due to delays in providing a SOAD. On average it took 6 days to arrange a visit. The problem has arisen because of the number of requests not for ECT visits, which have declined slightly, but for visits to approve medication (which are necessary after a patient has been detained for 3 months), and for visits for community treatment orders, which are much being used at a much greater rate than the government predicted. Altogether in 2009/10 there were over 15,000 requests for SOAD visits and only about 100 SOADs to do them. Fifteen years ago there were about 150 SOADs and only about 5,400 requests for visits. SOAD appointments are not for a full-time or even a part-time position; SOADs carry out visits for the CQC for a fee in addition to their regular work.

If the CQC could halve the time it took to arrange a SOAD visit, there would be little excuse for psychiatrists to use section 62. Patients who are thought to need ECT urgently are generally treated at the regular twice-weekly ECT clinics. If treatment is expected to wait 3-4 days for the next clinic, then it should be able to wait a similar length of time for a SOAD visit.

This entry was posted in ECT in the UK, ECT without consent. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to ECT without consent or a second opinion

  1. Cheryl Prax says:

    Keep up the good work. I have subscribed to your emails but I have also subscribed to Google Alerts on ECT (which is how I found you in the first place). Most of the Google Alerts ECT postings are positive from the industry or from individuals quoting the industry or from the odd celebrity who swears it has done them good (still having monthly maintenance ECT!). There are some negatives but not enough. For various reasons ECT patients are reluctant to come forward and who can blame them. So your posts are vitally important. I use your posts to follow up on your sources. Hopefully I will be able to put this to good use in the future. We should all work towards banning ECT. People who cannot defend themselves are being abused with permanent brain damage.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s